SUNFISH LAKE CITY COUNCIL MEETING – DECEMBER 2, 2014

7:00 P.M. - ST. ANNE’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH

Attendants:

Mayor: Molly Park
Councilmembers: Mike Hovey, JoAnne Wahlstrom, Cathy DeCourcy and Steven Bulach

City Attorney: Tim Kuntz

City Building Official: Mike Andrejka

City Planner: Michelle Barness
City Engineer: Don Sterna

City Forester: Jim Nayes
City Treasurer: Ann Lanoue
Police Chief: Manila Shaver

City Clerk: Cathy Iago

Members of the General Public.

1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Park opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m.

Chief Shaver introduced the West St. Paul’s newest police officer who was also a resident of Sunfish Lake, Officer Curtis Syvertsen. He explained that he met Curtis while he was still in college and found that he was interested in law enforcement. He stated that the department tested 250 applicants and that Curtis was the top applicant of the eight finalists for the job. He also explained that Curtis had requested to be designated as the neighborhood officer for the City of Sunfish Lake given his knowledge of the community and the residents.

Council offered their congratulations to Officer Syvertsen and thanked the Chief for the introduction.

2. APPROVE AGENDA: Mayor Park asked if there any additional items for discussion and there was no response.

Councilmember Wahlstrom moved approval of the Agenda, seconded by Councilmember DeCourcy and carried. (5-0)

3. CONSENT AGENDA: The Mayor asked if there were any questions relating to any items on the Consent Agenda. She offered a grammatical correction on page 3 of the minutes, changing “Wind Hills Road” to “Windy Hill Road”.

The Mayor asked if there were any further comments or questions and there was no response.

Councilmember Hovey moved approval of the Consent Agenda with the grammatical correction to the minutes, seconded by Councilmember Bulach and carried. (5-0)

a. Regular Council Meeting minutes of November 5, 2014

b. List of Bills
c. Monthly Financial Statements

4. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: Mayor Park asked if there were any comments from the public.

Dr. Michael Prueher and his son Alden were present and explained that Alden was attending the meeting as a requirement to obtain a Boy Scout merit badge. Alden explained he was seeking the “Star Scout” badge and would continue to pursue the badges necessary to achieve Eagle Scout status.

The Mayor asked if there were any further comments or questions and there was no response.

5. PUBLIC HEARING/PRESENTATIONS: a. Public Hearing to Consider Budget and Tax Levy for the Year 2015:

Mayor Park opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. for the purpose of reviewing and receiving comments relating to the proposed 2015 Budget and Tax Levy for the City of Sunfish Lake. She asked the Treasurer to review the proposed budget and tax levy for those present.

Treasurer Lanoue stated that the City annually conducts a truth in Taxation Hearing to review the proposed City 2015 Budget and Tax Levy for residents and receive their comments. She noted that the tax capacity rate for the City taxes are .23869 or $30.0% of the tax dollar. She advised that the School District, County and Special Districts make up the remaining tax dollar collected. She advised that the General tax Levy proposed for 2015 was $389,589 which is a 3.6% increase from 2014 and that the Bond Levy was proposed at $40,300 for an increase of $16,752 from 2014. She explained that the first interest payment would be made in August of 2015 and the second interested payment would be due in February 2016. She noted that the City would be paying on two bond issues for 4 to 5 years.

The Treasurer reviewed the comparison of Average Home Values and the Impact of Proposed Tax Rate Certified to Dakota County for the mean and median percentage changes. She advised that the proposed property tax would increase 1.71% if the Tax Levy for 2015 was adopted.

Treasurer Lanoue reviewed the proposed 2015 City Budget Revenue projections and explained that the projections were based on the property tax increase the franchise fees and permit and plan checks. She stated that revenues were projected to increase 10.4%. She then reviewed the proposed budget expenditures and explained the largest increase related to the bond interest and reserves for street maintenance. She advised the 2015 Budget as presented has a 5.8% increase over the 2014 City Budget.

The Treasurer stated that the overall budget documents are similar to prior years and that Council would be requested to adopt the 2015 Budget and Tax Levy later on the agenda to be certified to Dakota County in December and filed with the Minnesota Department of Revenue and State Auditor. She offered to respond to questions.

Mayor Park thanked the Treasurer for her presentation and opened the public hearing for any comments from the audience. There were no comments from the floor.

The Mayor called for a motion to close the public hearing.

Councilmember Bulach moved to close the public hearing at 7:25 p.m., seconded by Councilmember Hovey and carried. (5-0)

Councilmember Wahlstrom commended the Treasurer for a great presentation.

Mayor Park asked if there were any further comments or questions from Council and there was no response.

6. PLANNING COMMISSION/PLANNER’S REPORT: a. Consider Conditional Use Permit for Antenna Update, 2035 Charlton Road, Crown Castle/T-Mobile: Planner Barness explained the request of Crown Castle, on behalf of T-Mobile, for a conditional use permit to update antennas on the existing wireless communication tower at 2035 Charlton Road. She stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires that personal wireless service antennas not located on a public structure be approved by conditional use permit. She advised that the plan submitted are for the addition of three (3) antennas and updates to the existing equipment shelter at the base of the wireless tower. She noted that no additional height is proposed and that a report was submitted from an engineer that states the structure was capable of handling the additional antennas.

The Planner stated that a public hearing was held at the Planning Commission meeting and the Commission recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the antenna updates based on the finding that the antenna project meets CUP requirements outlined in Section 1226 of the Zoning Code. She advised that she prepared a draft resolution for approval that contains the findings of the Planning Commission for Council consideration. She noted that there were no conditions included as part of the recommended approval. She offered to respond to questions.

Mayor Park commented that she has difficulty receiving service on her cellphone in the City and that her visitors had also expressed this problem.

Councilmember Bulach and Dr. Prueher agreed that they had limited cellphone service in their areas.

Kathy Wenger, Real Estate Specialist representing Crown Castle, was present but stated she was unable to address this matter.

Mayor Park asked if she was able to discuss the new technology associated with the updates and if the 75 ft. height of the tower was the standard.

Ms. Wenger stated she was not able to address the technology since each carrier has different technology. She explained that in her experience the standard tower height is 100 ft. and that in some farmland areas very tall guide towers are installed. She stated that most carriers are not aware of problems with cellphone coverage until a customer advises them.

Mayor Park asked if there were any further questions and there was no response.

Councilmember Bulach moved to adopt Resolution No. 14-37 titled, RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ANTENNA UPDATES ON THE EXISTING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION TOWER LOCATED AT 2035 CHARLTON ROAD, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, based on the findings of fact as listed in the resolution, seconded by Councilmember Hovey and carried. (5-0)

Planner Barness advised that AT & T also submitted an application for antenna updates on the same tower this month.

b. Consider Amendment to Animal Ordinance to Implement Locational Requirements for Non-Domestic and Farm Animals: Planner Barness explained that the Planning Commission was provided a memorandum addressing the potential implement of farm and non-domestic animal setback requirements and a draft ordinance amendment to Section 1225.01E of the Zoning Ordinance for consideration at their November meeting. She stated that a public hearing was held to receive input from residents. She explained that her memorandum summarized ordinances from cities similar in size to Sunfish Lake, such as Woodland, and contained a summary of setback consideration, criteria and methods for implementing an animal ordinance amendment. She noted that she included possible setbacks from lot line, principal structure, wetlands and viewing from the lake. She pointed out that she did not include a specific number for the setback, preferring to allow the Commission to determine an appropriate distance.

The Planner advised that the current ordinance does not contain any setback requirements for non-domestic and farm animals except horses. She stated that setbacks are included that if a building is constructed to house animals, but the ordinance does not address temporary structures.

Planner Barness stated that the Planning Commission recommended that the structure to house non-domestic and farm animals may not be closer to the adjacent property line than it is to the principal structure on the property, but must be setback a minimum of 25 ft. She advised that previously approved administrative permits for keeping of such animals would be grand-fathered in. She explained that the Commission also recommended a 25 ft. setback from wetlands. She stated that the Commission determined if would be difficult to determine a visual setback from the lake and determined that if a structure was built on the lake side of the property it would be regulated by the 200 ft. setback from the high water mark.

The Planner reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation for the ordinance amendment and explained that under Section 1.d. the amendment would read as follows:

d. The ability an animal enclosure to meet the following setback and locational standards (where other setback or locational standards can apply to buildings and structures used for enclosures, the more restrictive requirements shall apply).

1. The animal enclosure may not be located closer to the boundary line of an adjacent property than to the principal

structure on the animal owner’s property, and not less than twenty five (25) feet from the lot line.

2. Maintain a twenty five (25) feet setback from a wetland, pond or basin.

Councilmember Hovey asked how the regulations would apply for a dog kennel.

The Planner explained that a dog kennel would require an Interim Use Permit and also fencing; she noted that the fencing would require a 50 ft. setback. She advised that an interim use may be a temporary use and the criteria for approval would be reviewed on a property by property basis.

Mayor Park asked if the 200 ft. setback from the high water mark would apply and the Planner responded yes.

Mayor Park requested an explanation of the regulation relating to the structure not being closer to the neighboring property than to the property owner as required by the City of Minnetonka. She noted that the structure on the Prueher’s property was way back into the yard.

Planner Barness explained how the setback would be calculated so that it would not be closer to the neighboring property than to the principal structure on the owner’s property. She advised that the Prueher’s permit was grandfathered in.

Dr. Prueher stated that his lot is pie-shaped and that the coop on his property is positioned in the middle of the rear yard.

Mayor Park explained that she had sent the Planner the City of Woodland’s recently adopted ordinance, as this community is similar in size and demographics to Sunfish Lake. She noted that their ordinance requires a structure be taken down when it is not being used for chicken keeping.

Councilmember Hovey pointed out that if the structure was originally used as a playhouse, he did not see any reason for it to be taken down since it could then be used for its original purpose.

Councilmembers Wahlstrom and DeCourcy agreed and did not see any reason for the structure to be taken down.

Councilmember Hovey asked if the Planner could provide a definition for ponds and wetlands. The Planner stated she would have to research the definition.

Planner Barness explained that the question of permit renewals was also discussed and noted that the City of Woodland requires an initial inspection of the property prior to issuing a permit and another inspection prior to renewal of the permit. She stated that the commission did not require an additional inspection and deferred that issue to Council.

Councilmember Hovey stated that in his opinion if neighbors do not complain about the chicken-keeping it should not be necessary to have another inspection prior to renewal of the permit.

Forester Nayes agreed and explained would be reasonable to review the property prior to renewal, but in his opinion an annual inspection is not required.

The Planner stated if complaints are received the initial permit fee does not cover additional inspections on the property and therefore the inspection costs would be absorbed by the City. She indicated that the City may consider increasing the fee slightly to cover an additional inspection.

Mayor Park asked if there were any additional questions or comments and there was no response.

Councilmember DeCourcy moved to adopt the Ordinance Amending section 1225.01E (Farm and non-domestic animals) of article XII (Zoning regulations) of the Sunfish Lake City Code, relating to required animal keeping setbacks in the City of Sunfish Lake, seconded by Councilmember Hovey.

Attorney Kuntz explained that in his opinion the definition of wetlands, ponds and basins should be included as part of the ordinance amendment; he suggested that this matter be tabled and that staff could prepare a definition for Council consideration at the next regular meeting.

Councilmembers DeCourcy and Hovey, as maker and second agreed to withdraw the motion.

Councilmember DeCourcy moved to table this matter to the regular Council meeting in January, 2015 to allow staff to prepare a definition of wetlands, ponds and basins for Council review, seconded by Councilmember Hovey and carried. (5-0)

Planning Report: Planner Barness reviewed the December Planning Commission meeting items as listed in her report dated November 26, 2014.

2035 Charlton Road: The Planner stated that SAC Wireless/A T & T had applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow antenna updates on the cell tower located on St. Anne’s Church property at 2035 Charlton Road. She further advised that St. Anne’s Church requested a major site and building plan review for site improvements on the property located at 2035 Charlton Road.

Lot 2, Block 1, Windy Hill: Mr. Bancroft and Mr. Riley are requesting approval of a minor subdivision and conditional use permit for the property on Windy Hill Road. She explained the request for a minor subdivision for a lot split and combination to add a small area of land from their adjacent parcels. In addition Mr. Riley is requesting a CUP to be able to develop the subject parcel which would not be in conformance with requirements due to steep slopes, wetlands and easements.

240 Salem Church Road: The Vansteenburgs are requesting approval of a major site and building plan and a conditional use permit for the substantially revised plan for this site. The proposed changes are significant enough to warrant both full staff review of plans and review by Planning Commission and Council. The applicants have reduced the size of the home and incorporated additional changes to the plans.
Attorney Kuntz asked if the Riley’s had submitted a complete set of building plans for the home to be constructed on the property.

The Planner responded she had not reviewed the plans in detail and had only discussed the possible location and size of the home.

Mayor Park asked if the property would be a legally non-conforming lot.

Planner Barness explained that Mr. Riley had not provided a definite time frame for construction at this time.

Councilmember Hovey asked why the lot would not meet the 2.5-acre requirement. The Planner explained that the lot configuration and topography affect the calculation.

The Mayor asked if there were any comments or questions and there was no response.

Council thanked the Planner for her report.

7. INSPECTOR’S REPORTS: a. Building Inspector: Inspector Andrejka stated that he issued two (2) permits and closed one (1) in November.

Council thanked the Inspector for his report.

b. CITY ENGINEER: Engineer Don Sterna reviewed his report dated November 26, 2014. He stated that he conducted building and site reviews at St. Anne’s Church for the cell tower and had no comments on the project. He also reviewed the revised plans at 240 Salem Church Road and approved the plans to begin driveway grading and tree clearing. He commented that he was glad the applicant had removed the proposed underground garage for the home since they were unwilling to provide a waiver letter to the City relating to underground flooding of the structure.

The Engineer advised that he was working on the revised plans for 240 Salem Church Road, Lot 2, Block 1, Windy Hill (Bancroft – Riley) Minor Subdivision and CUP application and the St. Anne’s Church Major Plan review at 2035 Charlton Road. He noted that St. Anne’s plans include demolition of the home on the property and site and parking lot improvements.

2014 Improvement Project: Engineer Sterna stated that the final paper work from Danner Inc. was received on November 24, 2014 and he has been reviewing the documents to insure they are in compliance to finalize the project and submit the final payment to Danner.

Snow Plowing Activity for November: The Engineer Sterna advised he received several phone calls from residents on Acorn Drive and Salem Church Road. He stated there was an accident on Acorn Drive during the first snowfall event and he had the plowing service apply straight sale on the icy areas due to the cold temperatures. He noted the cost for the past month was $1,965 which should be the final costs for this winter season. He stated that cost incurred for 2014 was $20,711 out of the $30,000 budgeted amount.

Dr. Prueher stated that there is an area on Sunnyside Lane by the Halverson’s property that always gets icy during a snowfall event; he noted that some damaged the mailbox in the area. He indicated that the area always needs sand and salt due to the ice.

Engineer Sterna pointed out that the sand application would get blown away but that he would request the area be salted to assist with the icy conditions.

Public Works Activities Undertaken in the Month of November: Engineer Sterna stated there were no work activities undertaken in November.

Anticipated Engineer/Public Works Activities for the Month of December: Snow Plow Monitoring: The Engineer advised he would be monitoring snow and ice removal on City Streets; he asked that he be contacted by cell phone if Council or residents have concerns.

The Mayor asked if there were any comments or questions and there was no response.

Council thanked the Engineer for his report.

c. CITY FORESTER: Forester Nayes stated that he issued two (2) burning permits since in October. He explained he received permission from property owners at 7 Acorn Drive to treat small Oriental bittersweet infestation and two dozen plants were treated with herbicide. He advised he would monitor the site next year to access effectiveness of the treat. He also provided a short article regarding Oriental bittersweet for the City newsletter.

The Forester stated he completed clearance pruning along Charlton Road. He advised that there has been a dramatic improvement in reducing the brush pile issue at 6 Acorn Drive and that the contractor had called him to advise he would be picking up additional l firewood from the site. He noted there are still more brush piles to be dealt with at this location but the contractor has been chipping and burning the brush and removing additional buckthorn.

Forester Nayes stated he attended the Planning Commission meeting to discuss the animal permit guidelines and requirements and that he completed a site visit to assess the renovated playhouse chicken coop and chicken run on Salem Church Road. He commented that the coop and run are suitable for the small flock of chickens and that he would work with the property owner and neighbor on screening issues in the spring.

The Forester stated the first meeting of the Parks and Public Spaces Committee would be held on Wednesday, December 3, at 7:00 p.m. and the Firewise Committee meeting would be held on Wednesday December 10, at 7:00 p.m., both at St. Anne’s Church.

Forester Nayes recommended that the City conduct an aerial deer count this winter to assess the size of the deer population in the City. He explained the same organization that counted the deer in the past has offered to do it again and the costs should be between $600 and $700. He commented that the counts are coordinated with many cities and therefore the costs are relatively low due to coordinating schedules and flying time.

The Forester requested the Mayor be authorized to sign the Tree City application as he needs to process it this month.

Chief Shaver asked that the aerial deer count discussion be delayed until he provides the deer report.

Councilmember Hovey moved to authorize the Mayor to sign the Tree City application for submission, seconded by Councilmember Bulach and carried. (5-0)

Council thanked the Forester for his report.

d. PUBLIC SAFETY: Chief Shaver reviewed his report dated November 26, 2014 and noted that the false alarms were slightly lower than last year at this time. He explained there was one (1) fire alarm that was set off by construction and a recreational fire that had obtained a burning permit. He reviewed the other items listed in his report>

Councilmember Hovey asked if the Chief would provide contact information for Officer Syvertsen to be posted on the City website and the Chief responded yes, but noted it would not be until he had completed his training.

Council thanked the Chief for his report.

Chief Shaver asked if Council wished to discuss the deer report at this time and Council responded yes.

8.f. 2014 Deer Management Report: Chief Shaver explained that Investigator Matt Muellner start the Metro Bowhunters program in 2009 and the deer count at that time was 60 per square mile; he explained the DNR indicates should be 12-15 deer in an area that size. He noted that harsh winters and diseases are rationale for managing the deer population.

The Chief explained that the 2009-2010 deer season was accomplished by obtaining a special permit from the DNR to conduct the hunt at Musser Park and seven (7) antlerless deer were taken. In 2010 six (6) deer were taken and in 2011 three (3) deer were taken by the Metro Bow Hunters. He stated that in 2012 both residents and the Metro Bowhunters were allowed to hunt and eighteen (18) deer were taken. In 2013 eleven (11) deer were taken and in 2014 five (5) deer have been taken so far.

Chief Shaver pointed out that it appears that the program has been managing the population well. He explained that the last aerial count was done in 2009 and agreed that it should be done every five (5) years, or again this year.

Councilmember Hovey agreed that harsh winters are hard on the deer and there are a number of vehicle and deer accidents which occur due to the deer migration. He also noted that there are disease and tick issues. He explained that no firearms are used for the hunt, only bow hunting is allowed. He stated that in his opinion the City should continue to manage the deer population.

Chief Shaver commented that the cost for the aerial deer count had not increased substantially and was approximately $300 per hour. He indicated that the costs would be somewhat reduced by sharing the time with a neighboring city. He indicated that the count could wait until next year to allow budgeting for the event.

Councilmember DeCourcy explained that deer congregate in winter and that there would not necessarily be the same numbers as in spring. She commented that in her opinion the numbers are skewed.

Chief Shaver pointed out that normally the deer stay in the same area where they are born and if they do migrate somewhat they usually come back to the area. He pointed out that the count may be less due to harvesting or could be higher due to migration.

Councilmember Hovey stated that in his opinion the aerial count should be done to establish a baseline and determine if the program is working.

Mayor Park asked if the City could partner with Mendota Heights to accomplish the aerial count.

Attorney Kuntz asked if the price would be cut in half if the City partnered with a neighboring community.

Chief Shaver explained the cost would be based on the number of hours the helicopter flies to conduct the count.

Forester Nayes stated that the last aerial count took approximately two hours and that the cost would be $315.00 per hour. He commented that the cost is similar to the 2009 cost for the program.

Mayor Park asked if there were any further questions or comments and there was no response.

Councilmember Bulach moved to authorize the expenditure not to exceed $700.00 for conducting an aerial deer count in the City, seconded by Councilmember Wahlstrom and carried (Ayes: 4-Bulach, Wahlstrom, Hovey, Park; Nays: 1-DeCourcy)

Chief Shaver suggested that it may be appropriate to conduct a resident survey to find out if the program is working.

8. NEW/OTHER BUSINESS: a. Consider Resolution Adopting the Tax Levy for Collection in the Year 2015; and, b. Consider Resolution Adopting the General Fund Operating Budget for 2015: The Mayor asked if there were any further comments or questions regarding the tax levy or budget for 2015 and there was no response.

Treasurer Lanoue stated that the City Attorney prepared a memorandum dated November 26, 2014 relating to the General Fund Budget and tax Levy for 2015. She explained that the Total Budget Revenues for 2015 are listed at $504,749 and the Total Budget Expenditures are listed at $481,892, for an increase of $22,857.

Attorney Kuntz advised that Council should first adopt the General Fund Operating Budget for 2015 resolution and then adopt the Tax Levy for Collection in the Year 2015 resolution.

Mayor Park asked if there were any further discussion and there was no response.

Councilmember Hovey moved to adopt Resolution No. 14-38, titled RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE GENERAL FUND OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF SUNFISH LAKE FOR THE YEAR 2015, in the amount of $507,749, seconded by Councilmember DeCourcy and carried. (5-0)

Treasurer Lanoue reviewed the amounts listed in the Tax Levy resolution; General Property Tax Levy amount of $389,589, Improvement Bond Debt Retirement amount of $40,300 for a Final Net Levy amount of $429,889.

Mayor Park asked if there were any further discussion and there was no response

Councilmember Hovey moved to adopt Resolution No. 14-39 titled RESOLUTION LEVYING AND ADOPTING THE TAX LEVY FOR COLLECTION IN THE YEAR 2015 in the amount of $429,889, seconded by Councilmember Wahlstrom and carried. (5-0)

c. Consider Resolution Setting Dates for the Regular City Council Meetings for 2014: Attorney Kuntz presented the proposed resolution setting the dates for the Regular City Council meetings for 2015. He advised that Council should adopt the resolution as presented if no further changes are suggested.

Councilmember DeCourcy asked if any dates had to be altered because they were close to holidays.

Attorney Kuntz stated that staff had checked the dates prior to submitting them for Council approval.

The Mayor asked if there were any comments or questions and there was no response.

Councilmember Wahlstrom moved to adopt Resolution No. 14-40 titled, RESOLUTION SETTING DATES FOR THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS FOR 2015, seconded by Councilmember Bulach and carried. (5-0)

d. Consider Resolution Setting Dates for the Regular Planning Commission Meetings for 2014: Attorney Kuntz explained that Council normally refers action on this item to the Planning Commission at their regular meeting in January.

The Planner stated she would present the resolution to the Commission at their next meeting.

Councilmember concurred to forward the resolution to the Planning Commission for their consideration at their regular meeting in January.

Attorney Kuntz explained that he provided a resolution adopting the dates for submission of planning applications and recommended that Council approve the resolution.

Councilmember Hovey moved to adopt Resolution No. 14-40-A titled, RESOLUTIONSETTING DATES FOR PLANNING AND LAND USE APPLICATION DEADLINES FOR THE YEAR 2015, seconded by Councilmember DeCourcy and carried. (5-0)

Attorney Kuntz explained that there are no fees that require changes for 2015 and therefore no action is necessary.

Councilmember Hovey asked the Planner to send him the fee schedule for 2015 to post on the City website.

e. Consider Resolution Authorizing Submission of the 2015 Small Community Funding Application to Dakota County Requesting Funding to Operate a Citywide Recycling Program: Clerk Iago referred to her memorandum dated November 24, 2015 requesting adoption of the recycling grant application for 2015. She explained that the grant monies are used to administer the City’s recycling program and for publication of the City’s newsletter.

The Mayor asked if there were any questions or comments and there was no response.

Councilmember DeCourcy moved to adopt Resolution No. 14-41 titled, RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE 2015 SMALL COMMUNITY FUNDING APPLICATION TO DAKOTA COUNTY REQUESTING FUNDING TO OPERATE A CITYWIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM, seconded by Councilmember Bulach and carried. (5-0)

Mayor Park asked if there was any further business and there was no response.

9. ADJOURN: Councilmember Bulach moved for adjournment at 8:45 p.m., seconded by Councilmember Hovey and carried. (5-0)


___________________________ ___________________________
Molly Park, Mayor Catherine Iago, City Clerk